Flux 2 vs Z-Image Turbo
Film grain, retro aesthetic, and nostalgic filters — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Vintage & retro visuals live or die on texture and tone: believable film grain, slightly imperfect contrast, nostalgic color shifts, and era-specific styling that doesn’t look like a modern filter slapped on top. Influencer Studio offers two strong options for this workflow: Flux 2 and Z-Image Turbo.
Below is a practical comparison focused on retro aesthetics—how well each model handles film-like grain, old-photo patina, and consistent nostalgic looks (including when using LoRA), plus what you get for the credits.
Vintage & Retro — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"Late-20s woman with a shaggy dark-brown bob and wispy bangs, wearing a faded band tee tucked into high-waisted light-wash mom jeans and chunky white sneakers, holding an iced coffee and half-smiling while glancing near the front camera like she just started an Instagram story. Shot in a small cozy café by a window with natural afternoon light, messy table with a notebook and lip balm, candid handheld phone-camera feel. Vintage 90s disposable-camera look with warm faded colors, film grain, slight blur, and a subtle light leak in the corner."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Strong retro authenticity via style transfer and image-to-image editing—useful for turning modern shots into believable vintage looks
- Higher detail headroom (up to 4MP) helps preserve fine grain patterns, paper texture, and subtle lens/print artifacts
- LoRA fine-tuning support enables consistent era-specific styles (e.g., 70s magazine print, 90s disposable camera, VHS-era promo stills)
- Versatile editing toolkit (including face-swap support) for keeping subjects consistent while changing the retro treatment
- Two pricing tiers (Standard 22 credits; Klein 9B 16 credits) for balancing quality vs cost on nostalgic campaigns
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid exploration of retro directions (grain strength, color cast, vignette intensity, era cues)
- Cost-effective at 8 credits per image—ideal for high-volume vintage variations and moodboard building
- LoRA support makes it easy to apply a consistent nostalgic filter aesthetic across many outputs
- Solid standard-quality text-to-image and image-to-image for straightforward retro transformations without heavy editing needs
Verdict
If your priority is premium vintage realism—clean-but-authentic film grain, nuanced color aging, and higher-resolution outputs that hold up under closer inspection—Flux 2 is the better fit, especially when you need editing flexibility and consistent subject handling.
If you’re optimizing for speed and volume—testing lots of nostalgic directions quickly, generating large batches of retro concepts, or keeping credit spend low—Z-Image Turbo is the practical choice. Many teams use Turbo for exploration, then switch to Flux 2 for the final, most convincing retro selects.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for vintage & retro.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand