Flux 2 vs Z-Image Turbo
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Beauty content lives or dies on detail: believable skin texture, accurate undertones, clean eyeliner edges, and consistent face identity across a look series. Flux 2 and Z-Image Turbo are two Influencer Studio image models built for creators who need everything from skincare close-ups to full glam campaigns.
Below is a practical comparison focused on skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content—covering realism, controllability, LoRA-driven brand aesthetics, editing workflows, speed, and credits-per-image.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid phone-camera selfie of a 20s beauty influencer with shoulder-length dark brown hair in a messy clip, wearing an oversized gray hoodie, sitting at a small bedroom vanity and looking slightly past the lens while blending concealer under one eye with a damp makeup sponge. Soft ring-light glow mixed with morning window light, dewy flawless skin, natural brows and glossy lips, with a simple lineup of skincare and makeup (tinted moisturizer, concealer wand, blush stick, setting spray) neatly arranged on the vanity and a slightly messy bed in the background. Authentic “get ready with me” vibe, handheld framing, casual and relatable like an Instagram story."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Flux 2 | Z-Image Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Black Forest Labs | Tongyi Lab (Alibaba) |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image, image-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Low |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Model Variant | Standard, Klein 9B | — |
| Starting Price | 22 credits | 8 credits |
Flux 2 Strengths
- Stronger high-detail output (up to 4MP) for skincare close-ups, swatches, and sharp makeup edges (liner, lashes, brow hairs)
- More versatile image editing for refining looks (adjusting lip shape, eye makeup symmetry, hairline flyaways) without restarting from scratch
- Style transfer that helps match a consistent beauty aesthetic across a campaign (editorial, clean girl, K-beauty, soft glam)
- LoRA fine-tuning support for repeatable brand identity—useful for consistent model faces, signature lighting, or packaging-forward visuals
- Face-swap support for maintaining creator identity across multiple makeup looks and seasonal drops
Z-Image Turbo Strengths
- Ultra-fast generation for rapid ideation of makeup concepts (colorways, eyeliner styles, blush placement) and high-volume testing
- Lowest cost per image (8 credits) for mood boards, thumbnail exploration, and concept drafts
- LoRA support for applying a consistent beauty style quickly (e.g., dewy skincare glow, studio beauty lighting, editorial makeup)
- Good baseline text-to-image and image-to-image for standard-quality outputs when extreme close-up detail isn’t the priority
Verdict
Choose Flux 2 when beauty realism and precision matter: skincare texture, clean foundation blending, accurate undertones, and crisp eye/lip details—especially if you’ll do iterative edits, need higher resolution, or want consistent identity across a full lookbook.
Choose Z-Image Turbo when speed and cost efficiency are the priority: generating lots of makeup ideas quickly, producing draft concepts for client approval, or running high-volume variations with LoRAs before upscaling or finalizing in a more detail-focused workflow.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Flux 2, Z-Image Turbo, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand