Compare Models (select 4)
Veo 3.1 and Wan 2.6 are two powerful video-generation models in Influencer Studio, each optimized for different production priorities. If you care most about cinematic polish, synchronized audio, and predictable 1080p output, Veo 3.1 is built for that workflow.
If your focus is keeping a character’s look consistent across shots and achieving natural movement—especially for longer series-style content—Wan 2.6 is a strong option. It also supports NSFW generation, which may matter for certain creators and use cases.
Side-by-Side Results
No comparisons available yet
Side-by-side video comparisons for Veo 3.1 and Wan 2.6 are coming soon.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Veo 3.1 | Wan 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google DeepMind | Alibaba |
| Subcategories | text-to-video, image-to-video | text-to-video, image-to-video |
| First Frame / Last Frame Support | Yes | No |
| Multi-shot Support | No | No |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | Yes | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Completely Open (18+) |
| Mode | Quality, Fast | 5, 10, 15 |
| Duration | 4s, 6s, 8s | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9, 9:16 | — |
| Audio | On, Off | — |
| Starting Price | 80 credits | 150 credits |
| Full Details | View Veo 3.1 | View Wan 2.6 |
Veo 3.1 Strengths
- Native 1080p output for clean, platform-ready delivery
- Native synchronized audio for more complete, shareable scenes
- Quality and Fast modes to balance fidelity vs turnaround time
- Accurate lighting and cinematic motion for high-end visual tone
Wan 2.6 Strengths
- Strong character consistency for recurring cast, series, and branded avatars
- Natural movements that help performances feel less robotic
- NSFW content generation support (where permitted by your policies)
- Great fit for character-led storytelling and multi-clip continuity
Verdict
Choose Veo 3.1 when you want the most “finished” cinematic look with native 1080p and synchronized audio, plus the flexibility of Quality vs Fast modes depending on your deadline and budget. At 80 credits per video, it’s also the more cost-effective option for frequent rendering.
Choose Wan 2.6 when character continuity and natural movement are your top priorities, or when you specifically need NSFW support. It costs 150 credits per video, so it tends to make the most sense for projects where consistency and motion realism outweigh raw cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Veo 3.1, Wan 2.6, and all our other AI models.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand