Compare Models (select 4)
Seedance 1.5 and Wan 2.6 are two strong video-generation options in Influencer Studio, but they’re optimized for different creative goals. Seedance 1.5 focuses on cinematic direction features—like native audio, lip-sync, and first/last frame control—while Wan 2.6 prioritizes character consistency and natural-looking motion.
If you’re building ads, talking-head clips, or tightly art-directed sequences, Seedance 1.5’s controls can reduce post-production steps. If you’re producing character-driven scenes where continuity and believable movement matter most—or you need NSFW support—Wan 2.6 is often the better fit.
Side-by-Side Results
No comparisons available yet
Side-by-side video comparisons for Seedance 1.5 and Wan 2.6 are coming soon.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Seedance 1.5 | Wan 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Alibaba |
| Subcategories | text-to-video, image-to-video | text-to-video, image-to-video |
| First Frame / Last Frame Support | Yes | No |
| Multi-shot Support | No | No |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Medium | Completely Open (18+) |
| Duration | 5, 8, 10, 12 | 5, 10, 15 |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Starting Price | 65 credits | 150 credits |
| Full Details | View Seedance 1.5 | View Wan 2.6 |
Seedance 1.5 Strengths
- Native audio generation option for end-to-end clips without external sound design
- Lip-sync support for dialogue-driven or creator-style talking scenes
- First & last frame control for tighter art direction and smoother transitions between shots
- Cinematic camera work for more “directed” movement and framing
- Pro and Lite modes to balance quality vs speed/cost depending on the project
Wan 2.6 Strengths
- Excellent character consistency for recurring characters across multiple clips
- Natural movements that help scenes feel less robotic or floaty
- Strong fit for character-led storytelling and continuity-heavy sequences
- NSFW content generation support (where permitted by your project requirements)
- Simple per-video pricing model (150 credits) for predictable budgeting
Verdict
Choose Seedance 1.5 when you need cinematic control and production-ready outputs—especially if you want native audio, lip-sync, or the ability to lock in first/last frames for precise editing and shot matching. It’s also a clear win when you want flexible pricing that scales by duration and whether audio is included.
Choose Wan 2.6 when your top priority is character consistency and natural motion, or when you specifically need NSFW support. Its flat 150-credit per video pricing can be convenient, but may be less cost-efficient than Seedance 1.5 for shorter clips or no-audio outputs.
Frequently Asked Questions
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Seedance 1.5, Wan 2.6, and all our other AI models.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand