Compare Models (select 4)
Kandinsky 5.0 and Wan 2.6 are two Influencer Studio video models aimed at different creative goals. Kandinsky 5.0 leans into artistic styling and vibrant color palettes for visually bold text-to-video results, while Wan 2.6 focuses on keeping characters consistent and motion looking natural across a clip.
Both models support NSFW generation, but they differ significantly in workflow and cost. Kandinsky 5.0 is priced at 20 credits per video, whereas Wan 2.6 is 150 credits per video and adds image-to-video for tighter control over subjects and continuity.
Side-by-Side Results
No comparisons available yet
Side-by-side video comparisons for Kandinsky 5.0 and Wan 2.6 are coming soon.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kandinsky 5.0 | Wan 2.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Sber AI | Alibaba |
| Subcategories | text-to-video | text-to-video, image-to-video |
| First Frame / Last Frame Support | No | No |
| Multi-shot Support | No | No |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Completely Open (18+) | Completely Open (18+) |
| Duration | 5s | 5, 10, 15 |
| Aspect Ratio | 3:2, 1:1, 2:3 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Starting Price | 20 credits | 150 credits |
| Full Details | View Kandinsky 5.0 | View Wan 2.6 |
Kandinsky 5.0 Strengths
- Strong artistic look with vibrant, stylized visuals
- Simple text-to-video workflow for quick concept exploration
- Budget-friendly pricing at 20 credits per video
- NSFW support for adult-oriented creative projects (where permitted)
Wan 2.6 Strengths
- Excellent character consistency for recurring subjects and series content
- More natural movement and motion realism in generated clips
- Supports both text-to-video and image-to-video for greater control
- NSFW support for adult-oriented creative projects (where permitted)
Verdict
Choose Kandinsky 5.0 if your priority is an artistic, high-color aesthetic and you want to iterate quickly at a low credit cost. It’s a strong fit for stylized promos, music-visual vibes, and experimental creative directions where “look” matters more than strict continuity.
Choose Wan 2.6 if you need consistent characters and believable motion—especially for episodic content, recurring influencer avatars, or shots where movement sells the scene. The higher 150-credit price is easiest to justify when image-to-video control and continuity reduce rework and reruns.
Frequently Asked Questions
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Kandinsky 5.0, Wan 2.6, and all our other AI models.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand