Grok Imagine vs Reve
Skincare, makeup looks, and beauty content — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for Beauty & Makeup content often comes down to three things: realistic skin rendering, flattering makeup detail (eyes, lips, lashes), and how reliably the model follows your creative direction for product and campaign visuals.
This comparison looks at Grok Imagine and Reve through a beauty-first lens—skincare textures, foundation finish, editorial makeup looks, and brand-ready posts—plus how each model’s strengths align with your workflow and credit budget.
Beauty & Makeup — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid TikTok-style front-camera selfie of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy dark brown hair, wearing a loose gray hoodie and minimal jewelry, sitting at a messy bedroom vanity while blending concealer under one eye with a damp beauty sponge; she’s glancing near the camera with a half-smile like she just started a “get ready with me.” Soft ring-light glow mixes with morning window light, showing dewy, flawless skin and natural freckles, with a small lineup of skincare and makeup (tinted moisturizer, blush stick, mascara, lip oil) arranged casually on the counter. The scene feels real and unpolished—slightly cluttered background, phone held at arm’s length, authentic influencer/UGC vibe."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Grok Imagine | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image, image-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Low | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 4 credits | 8 credits |
Grok Imagine Strengths
- Photorealistic skin and facial detail that supports close-up beauty shots (pores, glow, highlight placement)
- Strong creative compositions for editorial makeup concepts and campaign-style visuals
- Image-to-image support for iterating on an existing look (adjusting lip color, eye makeup intensity, lighting mood)
- High-detail output that helps with intricate elements like lashes, brows, and shimmer textures
- Better value for high-volume beauty testing and variations at 4 credits per image
Reve Strengths
- High aesthetic consistency for polished beauty visuals (clean, stylized, feed-ready looks)
- More reliable text rendering for beauty creatives that need on-image copy (shade names, step labels, promo lines)
- Strong text-to-image performance for concepting makeup themes and cohesive visual direction
- Great fit for branded posts where typography and layout matter as much as the face/product
- Useful for product-focused content where packaging text or simple label details must remain legible
Verdict
For photoreal skincare and makeup close-ups, rapid iterations, and cost-efficient testing of multiple looks, Grok Imagine is typically the better day-to-day choice—especially when you want to refine an existing image via image-to-image and push high-detail realism.
If your beauty content depends on accurate, readable text in the image (shade callouts, routine steps, sale overlays) and you want a consistently polished aesthetic for brand posts, Reve is the stronger pick—just plan for the higher cost at 8 credits per image.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test Grok Imagine, Reve, and all our other AI models for beauty & makeup.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand