GPT-Image 1.5 vs Reve
Attractive and approachable dating app photography — see how these models compare with real AI-generated outputs.
Full comparisonCompare Models (select 4)
Choosing the right image model for dating profile photos comes down to one thing: creating pictures that feel both attractive and approachable. That means natural facial features, flattering lighting, believable backgrounds, and styling that matches the vibe of the app—without looking overly edited or staged.
This comparison looks at how GPT-Image 1.5 and Reve perform for dating-app-ready photography, including prompt control (pose, outfit, setting), realism, “first photo” friendliness, and how their credit costs map to common profile-photo needs.
Dating Profile Photo — Side-by-Side Results
Prompt
"A candid dating-profile-style photo of a 20s woman with shoulder-length wavy brown hair, minimal makeup, wearing a simple white tee and light-wash jeans with a tan crossbody bag, holding her phone slightly above eye level for a flattering selfie. She’s standing on a sunny city sidewalk outside a cozy café, warm genuine smile and eyes looking right at the camera, mid-step like a real Instagram story moment. Natural golden-hour lighting, slight background blur with pedestrians and storefronts, unpolished and authentic like a Hinge/Bumble profile pic."
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GPT-Image 1.5 | Reve |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Reve |
| Subcategories | text-to-image | text-to-image |
| 1080p / 2k Mode | Yes | Yes |
| 4k Mode | No | No |
| NSFW Rating | Strict | Medium |
| Aspect Ratio | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 | 1:1, 16:9, 9:16, 3:4, 4:3 |
| Starting Price | 8 credits | 8 credits |
GPT-Image 1.5 Strengths
- Strong prompt adherence for dialing in dating-photo specifics (smile intensity, eye contact, outfit, background, time of day)
- High-fidelity detail that supports realistic skin texture, hair, and natural-looking lighting for a “real photo” feel
- Versatile scene control for creating a cohesive set (coffee shop, outdoor walk, candid street portrait) with consistent vibe
- Quality scaling via low/medium/high credit tiers (8/16/32) to match quick tests vs. final “hero” profile images
Reve Strengths
- Strong aesthetic polish that can produce flattering, app-friendly portraits with stylish color and composition
- Accurate text rendering when you want subtle, readable elements (e.g., a café sign, event badge, or jersey text) without gibberish
- Consistent per-image pricing (8 credits) that’s easy to budget for iterative dating-profile experimentation
- Creative styling support for standout profile shots (editorial vibe, cinematic lighting, or clean minimalist looks)
Verdict
Pick GPT-Image 1.5 if you care most about prompt-precise, realistic dating photos—especially when you want to control pose, expression, and environment to land the “approachable but confident” sweet spot. It’s also a good choice when you’re building a full set of images (lead photo + lifestyle shots) and want higher-fidelity options for final picks.
Pick Reve if your priority is aesthetic appeal and clean, stylish results with straightforward per-image budgeting. It’s particularly useful when you want a more curated look that still reads well on dating apps—and when legible text details matter in the scene.
Frequently Asked Questions
More Comparisons by Category
Try Both Models Free
Sign up and get credits to test GPT-Image 1.5, Reve, and all our other AI models for dating profile photo.
Join Influencer Studio Today
Start creating amazing AI-generated content for your brand