[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"$fxXR8w-vbps6V1qEnw0-AnVFQWXs6T7ujVQ66DIVuljc":3},{"modelA":4,"modelB":36,"comparisons":78,"seoContent":79,"isGenerating":173},{"slug":5,"name":6,"provider":7,"category":8,"capabilities":9,"pricing":17,"badge":7},"veo-3-1","Veo 3.1","Google DeepMind","video",[10,11,12,13,14,15,16],"Text-to-video","Image-to-video","Quality mode (richer detail, smoother motion)","Fast mode (cost-effective, quicker turnaround)","Native 1080p resolution","Native synchronized audio","Accurate lighting",[18,21,24,27,30,33],{"label":19,"credits":20},"4s (no audio)",88,{"label":22,"credits":23},"4s (with audio)",120,{"label":25,"credits":26},"6s (no audio)",132,{"label":28,"credits":29},"8s (no audio)",176,{"label":31,"credits":32},"6s (with audio)",180,{"label":34,"credits":35},"8s (with audio)",240,{"slug":37,"name":38,"provider":39,"category":8,"capabilities":40,"pricing":47,"badge":46},"wan-3","Wan 3","Alibaba",[10,11,41,42,43,44,45,46],"First + last frame","Reference-to-video (up to 10 images, 5 video, 5 audio)","Talking heads (audio-driven, with influencer reference)","Native audio","Clips up to 30 seconds","Less restrictions",[48,51,53,56,58,61,63,66,68,71,73,76],{"label":49,"credits":50},"5s (no audio)",175,{"label":52,"credits":50},"5s (with audio)",{"label":54,"credits":55},"10s (no audio)",350,{"label":57,"credits":55},"10s (with audio)",{"label":59,"credits":60},"15s (no audio)",525,{"label":62,"credits":60},"15s (with audio)",{"label":64,"credits":65},"20s (no audio)",700,{"label":67,"credits":65},"20s (with audio)",{"label":69,"credits":70},"25s (no audio)",875,{"label":72,"credits":70},"25s (with audio)",{"label":74,"credits":75},"30s (no audio)",1050,{"label":77,"credits":75},"30s (with audio)",[],{"metaTitle":80,"metaDescription":81,"introText":82,"modelAStrengths":83,"modelBStrengths":87,"verdict":92,"faqs":93,"shortAnswer":112,"bestForRows":113,"attributeScores":133,"whatExamplesShow":154,"methodology":165},"Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3 Examples — AI Video Model Comparison","Compare Veo 3.1 and Wan 3 side by side. Real AI-generated outputs, a verdict, pricing, and use-case recommendations to pick the best model.","\u003Cp>Comparing Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3 for video content? This page breaks down how the two video models differ on realism, text rendering, editing flexibility, cost, and final polish — with a clear recommendation for which to test first.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Veo 3.1 state-of-the-art video with Quality and Fast modes, native 1080p, and synchronized audio for high-quality ads. Wan 3 long-take hyper-real video with native audio and fewer content restrictions. Below you'll find a quick verdict, a best-for breakdown, an attribute-by-attribute scoring table, real side-by-side outputs, and answers to the most common questions.\u003C\u002Fp>",[84,85,15,86],"High-quality video with accurate lighting","Quality vs Fast mode for cost control","Reliable prompt adherence for ad creative",[88,89,90,91],"Clips up to 30 seconds in a single take","First and last frame control","Reference-to-video from images, clips, and voice","Fewer content restrictions","\u003Cp>Veo 3.1 and Wan 3 are both capable video models, but they win in different workflows. Reach for Veo 3.1 when you want high-quality video ads — it excels at high-quality video with accurate lighting, quality vs Fast mode for cost control, and native synchronized audio. Wan 3 is the stronger pick when you need long-take video, fewer limits — it excels at clips up to 30 seconds in a single take, first and last frame control, and reference-to-video from images, clips, and voice.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>For video content, either model works well. Run the same prompt through both, compare the outputs, and keep the one that fits your workflow.\u003C\u002Fp>",[94,97,100,103,106,109],{"question":95,"answer":96},"Which model should I choose first, Veo 3.1 or Wan 3?","Start with Veo 3.1. Run your prompt through both with the same settings, then keep whichever output is closer to your goal.",{"question":98,"answer":99},"Which model is better for video content?","Both Veo 3.1 and Wan 3 handle video content well. Choose Veo 3.1 for cheaper iteration and Veo 3.1 for the most polished final result.",{"question":101,"answer":102},"Which is more cost-effective, Veo 3.1 or Wan 3?","Veo 3.1 is more cost-effective, starting at 88 credits per output, which makes it the better choice for high-volume testing.",{"question":104,"answer":105},"Which model is better for readable text?","Veo 3.1 and Wan 3 render text similarly well, so either works for labels, overlays, and packaging.",{"question":107,"answer":108},"Which model is better for consistent AI influencer content?","Both hold consistency well; lock in your prompt and references and either model can carry a campaign.",{"question":110,"answer":111},"Can I test both Veo 3.1 and Wan 3 in Influencer Studio?","Yes. Sign up for free, run the same prompt through Veo 3.1 and Wan 3, and compare the outputs side by side before committing credits to a full batch.","Short answer: Veo 3.1 is better for high-quality video ads, while Wan 3 is better for long-take video, fewer limits. For video content, Veo 3.1 is the stronger first pick — run the same prompt through both and keep the winner.",[114,117,120,124,127,130],{"need":115,"pick":6,"why":116},"Lower-cost exploration and more variants per credit","Veo 3.1 costs 88 credits to start, so you can test more directions for less.",{"need":118,"pick":6,"why":119},"Polished, ready-to-ship final assets","Veo 3.1 produces stronger final-asset polish for campaign-ready output.",{"need":121,"pick":122,"why":123},"Readable text in designs, overlays, and packaging","Either model","Either model renders labels and typography more cleanly.",{"need":125,"pick":38,"why":126},"Editing and reference-driven iteration","Wan 3 is more flexible for editing from references or existing outputs.",{"need":128,"pick":122,"why":129},"Consistent characters and repeated campaign visuals","Either model holds character and style consistency better across outputs.",{"need":131,"pick":122,"why":132},"video content specifically","Both are well-suited to video content; pick by budget vs polish.",[134,138,141,145,148,150,152],{"criteria":135,"aScore":136,"bScore":136,"winner":137},"Realism",5,"tie",{"criteria":139,"aScore":140,"bScore":140,"winner":137},"Text accuracy",3,{"criteria":142,"aScore":140,"bScore":143,"winner":144},"Editing flexibility",4,"B",{"criteria":146,"aScore":143,"bScore":140,"winner":147},"Cost efficiency","A",{"criteria":149,"aScore":136,"bScore":143,"winner":147},"Final polish",{"criteria":151,"aScore":143,"bScore":143,"winner":137},"Consistency",{"criteria":153,"aScore":143,"bScore":140,"winner":147},"Best first test",[155,157,159,162],{"label":135,"text":156},"Both models produce comparably natural results in these examples.",{"label":139,"text":158},"Rendered text comes through cleanly on both sides.",{"label":160,"text":161},"Commercial usability","Veo 3.1 is closer to a ready-to-use video asset; Wan 3 is better for concepting.",{"label":163,"text":164},"Recommended next step","Keep the output that best matches your brief and generate variants from it.",{"lastUpdated":166,"modelsCompared":167,"useCase":168,"bestForA":169,"bestForB":170,"avoidA":171,"avoidB":172,"creditsA":20,"creditsB":50},"June 8, 2026","Veo 3.1 vs Wan 3","video content","high-quality video ads","long-take video, fewer limits","You need multi-shot storyboards in a single generation","You need 4K output or multi-shot storyboards",false]